Wake Up Canada : Case of Arthur Topham ( Part 2 )

Wake Up Canada : Case of Arthur Topham ( Part 2 )

 http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/11/doug-christie-on-suntv-authur-topham.html

Muslim Hate Speech and Arthur Topham: The deception of “Hate Speech” Laws [+ VIDEO of Doug Christie and Ezra Levant on SunTV]

Doug Christie on Sun TV

You can find out more about the Topham case at http://www.radicalpress.com.  Topham was charged under Canada’s ridiculous criminal “hate” law – Section 319 of the Criminal Code.   This nutty law tries to control human emotions, and as the norm for so-called “hate” laws … only applies to one certain type of opinion.

When “hate” is promoted in Canada, it is only criminalized if the communicator of the message is an alleged “nazi” or white “anti-Semite”.  Just look at all the cases stretching back to the 1970’s.  If you hate whitey — no problem.  If you are Muslim and hate Jews — no problem.  If you are Jewish and hate Muslims — no problem.

Here is proof of my point:

On the same day that white skinned – alleged “nazi” and “anti-Semite” Arthur Topham was charged with criminal ‘hate speech”, the police looked at brown skinned Muslim hate against Jewish Canadians, and found no criminal “hate”.

In the Alice in Wonderland world of human rights and ‘hate speech” … some “hate” is criminal, while other “hate” is just fine.

Lets compare for a second, what Arthur Topham wrote to what was “anti-Jewish Curriculum” at the East end Toronto Madrassah. One was criminalized, the other was not.

Arthur Topham posted on his website:

It’s been ongoing since the day I first openly criticized the Zionist Jews and their political dogma or ideology known as Zionism. That was back during the heady last days of the 20th Century when I was publishing my monthly hard copy edition of The Radical, an alternative tabloid which ran for forty-two consecutive editions ending in June of 2002.
..

and from the National Post which described what Topham allegedly said and did:

The Biological Jew depicts Jews as parasites that suck the blood from their “host” societies while the Protocols is a fraudulent book that purports to describe a conspiracy for worldwide Jewish domination.
..
Police arrested Mr. Topham and questioned him on May 16. According to a transcript of his police interview that was posted online, he asked the investigating officer, Det. Const. Terry Wilson of the B.C. Hate Crime Team, whether he had been trained in Tel Aviv or whether Mossad had come to Canada to train him.

He lectured the officer about how Jews “control what you’re doing” and said they had “created the unit you’re working for.” He asked the officer if he was a Christian and scolded him for what he was doing.

These guys have spent the last 2,000 years trying to destroy our religion, and you like a Judas are out here like a, like one of their dogs chasing down people who are trying to defend the Christian religion,” he said. “You ought to be ashamed of yourself.”

Now lets compare what the Muslim’s East end Madrassah (Toronto) allegedly taught to children in their Curriculum. This again is quotes from the National Post’s article (published Nov 8, 2012).  I can not actually verify their authenticity:

End of Jewish Plots and Treacheries: Ever since the Prophet’s entry into Madina, the treacherous Jews had vehemently opposed him and his Islamic call, evoking memories of their hostility to the previous Prophet, Jesus Christ, half a millennium ago. The crafty Jews entered into an alliance with the polytheist Quraish in a bid to stamp out Islam. They conspired to kill Prophet Muhammad despite the fact that he was lenient towards them and had treated them kindly, hoping to convince them of Islam’s truth. But eventually as Jewish plots and aggressions increased, he had no choice other than to take up arms against them, in order to protect Islam and the Muslims. At the battle of Khaiber which is famous for Imam Ali’s heroic exploits, the Prophet defeated them ending Jewish intrigues and conspiracies in Arabia.” [Emphasis added]

Why is it that so-called “hate” laws only ever target one certain opinion, and all the other haters are given a free pass?  Would Canada’s criminal prohibition against “hate” ever be found constitutional if the courts looked at the actual effects and operation of the law?  After 30 years, it is as clear as day; this law targets a certain range of opinions in Canada, and has little to do with actually removing hate.  As we have documented over and over, some hate in Canada is perfectly fine and non-criminal.

If you have an opinion which can be classified as “nazi” or “anti-Semitic” and you’re White;  expect the state to drop the ‘trifecta of tolerance’ on you.  Which is a three stage, proven framework, to break and humiliate the victim — all at the expense of Canadian taxpayers who foot the bill for this multi-million dollar make-work project.   The stages can be defined as: ostracized, vilified and criminalized.

Section 319 of the Criminal Code is an affront to justice and freedom in Canada and should be repealed immediately.  Canada is a tolerant country with intelligent people, and we do not need the nanny state (at the behest of special interest groups and plaintiffs of fortune) looking over the shoulders of people and parsing the words of individuals that wish to express non-violent opinions on controversial subjects as race or religion.

We have tried the censorship of criminal and civil prohibition’s against “hate” speech since the 1970’s with little positive effect.  Isn’t it time to give freedom a chance?

-Marc Lemire
Free Speech Activist and the only 
Canadian to ever win a Section 13 case
=======================================================================================================================================================
COMMENT :
I cut and pasted this for posterity, I am not necessarily  agreeing with  the comments posted in the article above . My points are  Where does Freedom of Speech versus  Hate Speech versus Censorship start and end ?…..Who defines it?…..Does this benefit society at large?….. Or is it an insidious weapon to be used by cowardly vested interests and special interest groups with other agendas ? .
Is the “Truth ” with “facts” a hate crime? Are the actual ” hate criminals”  the ones who hide behinds such laws and use the Gov’t resources to settle petty scores…and ruin peoples lives ?
Give me a break, the “usual suspects” are the biggest hypocrites on this planet whose own ethnic doctrine consider 99.99% of US as animals, simply cattle to serve THEM.
As I said in Part 1, this appears to be a very pick and choose case, whereby Arthur Topham,  a Caucasian in a rural area , is the bad guy made an example of….whereas any other group is Untouchable ? , not that I am saying the other group should be charged in tit – for – tat fashion.  There are far greater priorities requiring the Public’s resources than these silly pissing matches.
I mean, if we really want to push this issue I know of a “certain groups” religious – ethnic textbooks that should perhaps be given far more publicity and exposure, then we can really have a very good look at  certifiable HATE SPEECH.  Then we will see them scurrying back to from whence they came. Or is this their game..to keep OUR scent off of THEIR trail with smoke and mirrors.
Lets support free speech and open dialogue…separate the bullshit from the facts….even if we may need to acquire  a bit thicker skin.
Advertisements
Gallery | This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s