The Architecture of the New World Order
December 7, 2012
December 7, 2012
This week an icon of architecture died at the age of 104. He was Oscar Niemeyer, the Brazilian architect known for his projects of most public buildings in Brasilia.
He was, in a sense, more a master of drawing than an architect. His curves that evoked the mountains of his city of Rio de Janeiro are easily recognized. Much of his fame comes from the fact that he was one of the first to propose and build “habitable sculptures”. His buildings could easily be turned into small sculptures and displayed at a Soho art gallery.
Unfortunately, Niemeyer was a staunch communist. He was a great admirer of Stalin and Castro, and once said that the death of millions of people was a small price to pay for an utopia. He also supported the Marxist terrorist drug dealers of the FARC in Colombia (which flood Brazil with crack cocaine), and once drew a poster for them.
Niemeyer’s architecture was cold and oppressive. It was beautiful in paper and models, but inhumane in real life.
Check the picture with the Latin America Memorial, in Sao Paulo, a complex dedicated to the “oppression” of the continent by capitalism. It looks like a post-neutron bomb scenario, totally desolate of life. Check the size of the individual among a sea of concrete. He is nothing, much like the individual in a communist country.
Niemeyer received much praise (and work) because his buildings are imposing and look graceful in a photo taken from a carefully chosen angle. They are perfect post cards for the politicians, even if improper for human life. Brasilia, his master piece, is probably the saddest and coldest city in Brazil.
ARCHITECTURE AS SOCIAL ENGINEERING
It is not surprising that Niemeyer’s idol has been Swiss-French architect Le Corbusier, who regarded houses not as homes, but as machines for living.
His works, such as the sad “banlieus” in Paris, have become huge urbanist failures, completely deteriorated and a cradle for criminality and social exclusion. Its imponent landscapes have no owners; its oppressive and isolated walkways turned into solitary places for robbery and rape.
Le Corbusier was so arrogant that he even designed whole cities, his Ville Contemporaine, which, if it were ever build, would bring the nightmare of Metropolis into fruition.
Interestingly, Le Corbusier had fascist tendencies. This again proves that Marxism and fascism are twin brothers, both dedicated to the authoritarian mission of reshaping society into the mold created by a few elect. The individual, you and me, are just details in these megalomaniac dreams.
Amongst all artistic activities, perhaps architecture is the one with the most effect on human life. It determines how we interact with the environment, with our social groups and even interferes with our own perception of our place in the world. It is impossible not to feel helpless and oppressed when placed in buildings such as the Red Army Theatre in Moscow or the government buildings in Beijing. They are built to make the citizen give up any hope of standing against the State.
(Young Architect as Commie dupe)
Why was Niemeyer special ? Because he was able to disguise the same horrible intent with a graceful curve and a light design. Therefore, he was much more dangerous.
Oppressive architecture fits inside a more encompassing plan known as the United Nations Agenda 21. It is a blueprint for the control and domestication of human life, concentrating people in small, overcrowded cities, living in vertical slums with 300 square feet apartments, while the globalist elite lives in old style neo-classic mansions or mediterranean villas.
Timely article…as I was musing on this AGENDA 21 and invasion of Hi – Rise buildings. Again always flip the coin over…look at the other side of the issue. Is the sales pitch BULLSHIT….simply bait for a trap ?
Perhaps GOOGLE “Potemkin village”. These were prop buildings, like a movie set, and used by Communist to fool outsiders that “all is well”. One would never actually go into them, but notice them from a distance ….simply a psychological ploy that all is well in the Communist country.
There are apparently people that have never left Vancovuer Island in ther lives….hence their world is based on what they see on TV , Internet etc., but no chance to “kick the tires” and see the real world beyond their often self -imposed limitations.
I never had a positive impression re Hi Rises, I have always had some primal dislike of them, and even moreso with the explosive growth of their construction in recent years, some sort of foreboding. Cities by nature have high population densities… based on whatever density the Local Gov’t permits.
Strata living is set up to be socialistic….once you have sign the pseudo ownership documents, you are at the mercy of your neighbours whims prejudices etc. They become money pits..and I have cited experiences family members have.
However, on the psy-op side, I am getting the feeling that more and more people are being forced into this “stacked jail cell” option as the article above alludes to.
Then they develop the subliminal view that we are running out of land, when nothing could be further from the truth if theyw ould simply get out more and go for a long drive….as I stated a while back that the entire worlds population of (7) billion could fit into Ontario, have Single Family Housing with groups of (4). Compare this with the land leftover.
This “land shortage /save environment then ingrains the Agenda 21 aims….that we must save the environment ….when in fact we are actually cutting our own throats by effectively living in the equivalent of a bigger prison cell…except one that one can lock and secure from the inside and call it home……at least for now.
Or, the current purpose of Hi Density is a living abode….but what about in the future ?