Child porn and pedophilia to be legal soon, by Pandora Pushkin (Not satire) Part 1

Child porn and pedophilia to be legal soon, by Pandora Pushkin (Not satire) Part 1

By Dr Lasha Darkmoon on December 9, 2012

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=61715

Pandora Pushkin – Darkmoon.me Dec 8, 2012

 Alice in Wonderland

ALICE:  Help! I’ve just been raped by Jimmy Savile disguised as the Mad Hatter!
MAD QUEEN:  Too many complaints—off with her head!

If Jimmy Savile had lived a few more years—say ten at the most—he could have found himself living in a world in which pedophilia was legal. Instead of being vilified for his creepy sexual activities, Jimmy could have found himself a national hero.
Resorting to the same tactics used by gay rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek a similar legal status, arguing that their sexual desire for children is just a natural “sexual orientation”. If homosexuals like going to bed with their own sex and that’s okay, why is it so wrong if a 70-year-old man wants to go to bed with a 7-year-old girl?
“If a guy offers the kid candy and she consents to sex, what’s the big deal?” it’s now being asked. It’s not like he’s forcing her, is it? Shouldn’t the child have a choice to say Yes or No?
Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to identify homosexuality as simply an “alternative lifestyle” or sexual orientation, logically nothing would be off limits. Gay advocates have taken offense at such a position, insisting this would never happen.
Well, it’s happened.
Pedophiles are using exactly the same brand of logic as homosexuals once used to get their preferred form of sex legalized. Sodomy is just an alternative lifestyle. Gay sex is cool. Sure, we all know that. Like the world is round, gay sex is cool. Nothing wrong with gay sex. Gays are made like that. They can’t help it.
It follows from this argument that if a guy in his seventies fancies a 7-year-old girl, or boy, there’s nothing wrong with that, either. Heck, that’s how he’s made! It’s his sexual orientation. And what harm is he doing if the 7-year-old girl (or boy) doesn’t mind being specially nice to him for a little extra pocket money?
Calling him a “dirty old man” is sooo wrong! It shouldn’t be allowed. That’s hate speech, like calling someone a “kike” or “nigger”.
Come to think of it, what’s so wrong if this same guy is into corpses, like Jimmy Savile is reported to have been? Corpses can’t say “No”. So there’s no question about getting cadaveral consent.
Let’s consider necrophilia for a moment. This is not off-topic. It’s highly relevant.
I guess it’s possible to argue that sex with corpses can also be pretty cool and awesome. Like it’s just an alternative lifestyle. I mean, if you happen to be born with a natural sexual orientation for sex with the dead, maybe society should be a bit more tolerant and not start making moral judgments.
Maybe necrophiliacs ought to put in for protected minority status, just like pedophiles and homosexuals…?
I guess one way to settle this vexed question about necrophilia, if it’s right or wrong, is to ask yourself: if YOU were a corpse, how would you like someone to make use of your dead body for sexual purposes? It can easily be argued that most people are not going to mind, for no other reason than this: they’re going to be dead! How can you mind if you’re dead? When you’re dead, what do you care? If you don’t mind being burned to ashes or put six feet under, why should you mind being used as a sex object that gives pleasure to a necrophiliac?
Thus the smooth casuist will be able to argue.
I foresee certain problems of course with legalized necrophilia, but I am sure these can be overcome easily enough with advertizing campaigns on TV assuring the public that sex with corpses is just fine and dandy — just like killing innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan and Palestine is fine and dandy, if you can con people into thinking these people are very wicked.
I mean, if torture is okay — and torture IS perfectly legal in America and Israel — there’s absolutely no reason why necrophilia (or pedophilia with dead children) shouldn’t be legal too, is there?
I can understand that the relatives of the corpse might get a bit upset. That’s to be expected. Relatives can be like that. Uncooperative. But the responsible necrophiliac is never going to misbehave with  a corpse, is he?  If he’s got any self-respect, he’s going to check it out with the deceased’s relatives first. To ask if they mind. To get their compassionate consent.

“I’m dead and in the cooler
But I wanna come back
As a serial killer
Or a necrophiliac.”
— Anon, Kinky Graffiti

=============================================================================================================================================
COMMENT:
Another timely article, and one that validates what I have been predicting may happen in the near future. Once a certain line is crossed, it inevitably turns the issue from Objective to increasingly Subjective and relative. While this article(above) gets quite graphic…..it is also presenting a logical extrapolation of     ” What’s Next.”…..or ……” Where do we STOP… what is the BOTTOM…if ever….? “
This would be unheard of not that long ago……..but such deviant practices now have active lobby groups. So….What has happened ? What has changed ? In hindsight…if we are really honest with ourselves,we have simply been indoctrinated very slowly but surely. It is simply the quasi Bolshevik Revolution…a small minority with an agenda keeps pounding on the door, and the Courts and the Politicians capitulate to the agenda.
Then the General Public is so numbed and dumbed down via the continued propaganda of the agenda , weakens its resistance..and moreso via fear of Gov’t Laws to prosecute what are deemed Hate Crimes aka any /all opposition or concerns to the minorities agenda. The minority never becomes to majority, hence never reflects the views and opinions of the majority, but establishes a major foothold.
If the foothold is simply “accept us as we are”, and do not discriminate as you have in the past….that is one thing. However, if the acceptance was simply a foot in the door to OTHER agendas..the old Trojan Horse …is that the line that has been crossed ?.
I could get into studies that show that certain groups are disproportionally predisposed to what are currently defined as “sex crimes”, but I won’t get into that right now, you probably catch my drift.
The irony is many of these groups are solely defined via their sexual preferences.. choice of “partners”. The usual PR is the rights of ” mutually consenting adults ” . 
Now, that is becoming morphed into ONE adults choice overrides the other partner “X” ….OR to somehow package the proposed partner as an “adult”. The article (above) author has qualified her discussion as NOT SATIRE…..but sadly structured it into what could easily be a legal argument heard in a court.  The level playing field becomes subtely slanted to make one side ” The Victim ” who is being denied their rights by a prejudiced society. The best and better interests of the other side are pushed off to the side, made irrelevant etc…..

( To Be Continued )

About these ads
Gallery | This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Child porn and pedophilia to be legal soon, by Pandora Pushkin (Not satire) Part 1

  1. surfer says:

    This is sad and terrible. Not that homosexually to start with was not. I read that an old preacher said sin is like emptiness. You can’t fill it up, the emptiness just get bigger that you have to try to refill.
    Several years back someone I spoke with online was in to *dead people* I thought they were joining (thinking eww sick) but when they described how they used lights in the anus to warm the lower regions up. I was disgusted and turned off my talk with them never to speak with them again. I wondered who would allow someone like that into a morgue in the first place? I certainly would not be one wanting my loved one abused that way and felt sorry for the people it was done to. I sure they would have NEVER given permission. Thank you for this article. I appreciate your frankness.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s